5 Min In Clinical
Bookmark
Record learning outcomes
Despite advances in diagnosis, rehabilitation and pharmacotherapy, heart failure remains, all too often, a death sentence. Until recently, few drugs produced a marked clinical benefit in the most common type of heart failure in older people. Now sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors seem set to meet this important clinical need.
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a mainstay of type 2 diabetes management4 but, in addition to lowering HbA1C, increasing evidence shows that SGLT2is protect kidney and cardiovascular function.5
“We are starting to recognise that SGLT2is should be seen as cardiovascular drugs as opposed to glucose-lowering agents,” says Sotiris Antoniou, consultant pharmacist, cardiovascular, at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. “These cardiovascular benefits have been recognised in the recent NICE guideline whereby any person with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular disease should be considered for a SGLT2i.”
Two faces of heart failure
Sotiris Antoniou notes that according to the Quality and Outcomes Framework for 2020/21, about 1 per cent of adults in England have diagnosed heart failure.
Broadly, cardiologists divide heart failure patients based on whether or not the ejection fraction (how much blood the ventricles pump out during each contraction) is preserved. (What proportion of the ejection fraction needs to remain to be classified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF] is controversial.3)
HFpEF accounts for more than 70 per cent of heart failure cases in people older than 65 years and is associated with numerous comorbidities including obesity, hypertension, kidney disease, diabetes and metabolic syndrome.3 For instance, 80-90 per cent of people with HFpEF have a history of hypertension, while 60-75 per cent have a BMI over 30kg/m2.3 The combination of increasing longevity and these common comorbidities means that epidemiologists expect HFpEF to become more widespread,3 which will increase pressure on the NHS.
NHS services for heart failure are already stretched. According to the National Heart Failure Audit there were 69,556 heart failure admissions between April 2019 and March 20201 – so reducing hospitalisation is important. Across four large studies that enrolled people with type 2 diabetes, SGLT2is lowered the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure by between 27 and 39 per cent.6
“Heart failure is a long-term condition.We know that if someone is admitted for heart failure they are, unfortunately, likely to be admitted again. So, while reducing mortality is the ultimate goal, preventing hospitalisation is important from a patient’s and the NHS’s perspective,” says Antoniou.
“The SGLT2is empagliflozin and dapagliflozin reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and risk of hospitalisation in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF] regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes,” he says. “Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are NICE approved for HFrEF but there is a pressing need for new treatments.
“The EMPEROR-Preserved study shows that empagliflozin treats heart failure regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction. This is really important as the prevalence of HFpEF is increasing and no other study treatment evaluated has shown a statistically significant benefit in reducing the composite primary outcome.”
AstraZeneca reported in May that, “high-level results from the DELIVER phase III trial” suggested that dapagliflozin produced “a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure”. DELIVER enrolled heart failure patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (greater than 40 per cent).7 At the time of writing, the full results had not been published.
Licence extension
The MHRA recently extended empagliflozin’s licence to encompass adults with symptomatic chronic HFpEF, based largely on the EMPEROR-Preserved study. The agency had already approved empagliflozin for HFrEF.
During this study, 5,988 patients with class II–IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of >40 per cent received empagliflozin (10mg once daily) or placebo as well as their usual therapy. During a median follow-up of 26.2 months, patients who received empagliflozin were 21 per cent less likely to die from cardiovascular causes or be hospitalised for heart failure than those taking placebo (13.8 and 17.1 per cent respectively).
Total heart failure hospitalisations were 27 per cent lower with empagliflozin than placebo (407 and 541 respectively). Empagliflozin’s benefits appeared to be similar irrespective of whether or not the person had diabetes.8
Empagliflozin was well tolerated. About a fifth of patients in the empagliflozin (19.1 per cent) and placebo group (18.4 per cent) discontinued because of adverse events. Uncomplicated genital and urinary tract infections were more common in patients treated with empagliflozin than with placebo.8
Urinary tract infections, usually caused by Candida, were reported by about 10 per cent of women and 5 per cent of men taking SGLT2is.6 Antoniou suggests explaining to patients that SGLT2is work by passing excess glucose through the kidneys (see panel). “Glucose is a great medium for growing infections,” he notes.
“Pharmacists should stress the importance of good genital hygiene to help prevent opportunistic infections, such as thrush. In addition, with more glucose being excreted in urine, there is a greater chance of becoming dehydrated, so pharmacists should counsel patients about signs of dehydration, such as feeling thirsty and dry mouth. Of course, people with diabetes should follow the sick day rules.”9
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a rare but, obviously, potentially serious side-effect with SGLT2is in people with diabetes. The NICE type 2 diabetes guidance emphasises the importance of checking whether the person is at increased DKA risk (e.g. previous episode of DKA, is feeling unwell with an intercurrent illness or the person is following a very low carbohydrate or ketogenic diet) before starting a SGLT2i.4
Antoniou stresses, however, that healthcare professionals should keep the DKA risk in perspective. “The incidence of DKA with SGLT2is is less than the incidence of angioedema with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
“The rare cases of DKA should not prevent use of these life-changing agents,” Antoniou says. “Pharmacists can counsel people with diabetes about reducing the risk of DKA.” NICE suggests, for example, reminding people taking SGLT2is not to start very low carbohydrate or ketogenic diets without speaking to a healthcare professional.4
NICE recognises CV benefits
“The cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2is have been recognised in the recent NICE guideline for type 2 diabetes,” Antoniou notes. “Any person with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CVD as assessed by QRISK2 of 10 per cent or higher should be considered for a SGLT2i after metformin. Moreover, any patient who has type 2 diabetes and is receiving a statin should be considered for a SGLT2i.”
Antoniou stresses that SGLT2is should be considered cardio-renal-metabolic drugs that also improve glucose control rather than the other way round. “This needs to be communicated effectively across all healthcare professionals who interact and manage patients for CVD as there have been reports of clinicians suggesting to patients that they don’t need to be on a SGLT2i if they are not diabetic,” he says.
Antoniou hopes that updated guidance, such as the recently published NICE type 2 diabetes guidelines, that promote the role of SGLT2is in line with the evidence base will increase awareness of the benefits.
“With the recent top-line report that dapagliflozin met its primary endpoint in DELIVER7, we now have a class of agent that met its primary endpoint in a clinical study of HFpEF,” Antoniou concludes. “SGLT2is are the first and only agents to show clinical benefit in this group of heart failure patients and are a real step forward in helping manage patients with HFpEF.”
References
- Available here
- BMJ 2019; 364:l223
- Nature Reviews Cardiology 2020; 17:559-573
- Available here
- Annual Review of Physiology 2021; 83:503-528
- Nature Reviews Cardiology 2020; 17:761-772
- Available here
- New England Journal of Medicine 2021;385:1451-1461
- Diabetes UK Sick Day rules
Clinical
In Clinical